CE
Chord Energy Corp (CHRD)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Volumes and execution were strong: crude oil 156.7 MBopd and total 281.9 MBoepd exceeded the high-end of guidance, while E&P CapEx landed at the low end; Adjusted EBITDA was $547.2MM and Adjusted FCF was $140.8MM .
- Non-GAAP EPS was $1.79 vs S&P Global consensus of $1.88, a slight miss; GAAP diluted EPS was a loss of $(6.77) driven by a non-cash $539.3MM goodwill impairment tied to market cap declines amid weaker commodity prices .
- FY25 outlook raised: oil volumes +500 Bopd to 153.0 MBopd midpoint; CapEx lowered by $20MM to $1.35B midpoint; cash tax range cut to 3.5–6.5% of Adjusted EBITDA; FY25 Adjusted EBITDA ~$2.4B and Adjusted FCF ~$850MM (midpoint) .
- Capital return remains aggressive: base dividend $1.30/share and $55.0MM repurchases in Q2; board authorized a new $1B buyback; management emphasized repurchases given intrinsic value vs market pricing .
- Near-term stock catalyst: management guided to a Q4 production trough given turn-in-line cadence and capital allocation discipline, which some analysts said contributed to a “perplexing” stock reaction despite operational outperformance; management reiterated confidence in FY26 growth ramp and four-mile lateral program .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Production and cost execution: Oil volumes were above guidance; E&P CapEx at low-end; Adjusted FCF above expectations. CEO: “Chord Energy delivered another outstanding quarter… Free cash flow was above expectations” .
- Efficiency gains and four-mile laterals: Four four-mile wells drilled to date with costs below budget; TIL plan accelerated to seven four-mile wells in FY25; early results (Rysted) near two 2-mile wells’ cumulative output in ~150 days .
- Shareholder returns and liquidity: Returned over 90% of Adjusted FCF; repurchased shares; authorized $1B program; liquidity ~$1.83B with net leverage ~0.3x TTM as of July 31 .
What Went Wrong
- EPS miss and GAAP loss: Adjusted diluted EPS $1.79 missed S&P consensus; GAAP diluted EPS $(6.77) due to a $539.3MM goodwill impairment tied to market cap declines amid commodity price weakness .
- LOE at high end and NGL/gas realizations down sequentially: LOE $10.02/boe came in near top of range due to elevated workovers; NGL realizations were 9% of WTI and gas 32% of HH, reflecting seasonality .
- Production trough ahead: Fewer Q4 TILs and the decision to add a second frac crew late in 4Q drive a Q4 production trough, raising near-term optics despite better full-year free cash flow per share .
Financial Results
Headline Financials vs Prior Periods and Estimates
Note: S&P Global consensus values marked with *; Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Commodity Revenue Breakdown
Margins and Cost Metrics
Adjusted EBITDA Margin calculated from cited Adjusted EBITDA and Oil/NGL/Gas revenues .
Operating KPIs
Guidance Changes
3Q25/4Q25 selected guidance: Oil MBopd 153.5–157.5 / 143.5–148.5; Total MBoepd 275.7–285.7 / 261.8–274.8; E&P & Other CapEx $315–$345 / $295–$325 .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “Chord… delivered another outstanding quarter… Free cash flow was above expectations… strong execution… leading to an increase in our full-year production guidance and reduction in capital” .
- COO: “Relative to a two mile well, four mile wells are expected to recover 90% to 100% more EUR, for only 40% to 60% more CapEx… translating to an $8–$12/bbl cost of supply reduction” .
- CFO: “LOE was $10.2 per BOE… due to increased workover costs… Production taxes averaged 7.3%… below expectations due to nonrecurring refunds… Cash G&A… below guidance… full year cash tax range reduced to 3.5–6.5%” .
- CEO on AI/ML: “We went through 31 different projects… decentralized in concept but centralized in influence… building organizational excitement and momentum… tangible results… low cost” .
Q&A Highlights
- Four-mile program economics and permitting: Early results strong; economics robust even with some toe-mile degradation; permitting underway; potential for ~50% of future development to be four-mile laterals .
- Breakevens and cost structure: Four-mile adoption across half inventory implies ~$5/bbl corporate breakeven improvement; broad cost initiatives (LOE, GPT, G&A) in flight .
- AI/ML deployment: Internal “data camps” and tooling yielding efficiency; mix of internal builds and vendor solutions; cross-industry benchmarking .
- Production cadence/trough: Intentional capital allocation to maximize FCF/share vs absolute volumes; Q4 trough due to TIL cadence; ramp in early 2026 as the second frac crew returns in 4Q25 .
- Midstream egress: Engaging with counterparties; potential long-term improvements to differentials and GPT with additional egress .
Estimates Context
Notes:
- Bold misses/beats: Q2 2025 EPS miss; Q1 2025 EPS beat.
- S&P Global consensus values marked with *; Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Revenue definition caution: S&P “Revenue” may not equal company “Total revenues”; company also reports “Total oil, NGL and natural gas revenues” excluding purchased oil/gas sales, which affects comparability .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Operational outperformance continued despite macro headwinds; production beat and CapEx discipline drove strong Adjusted FCF, enabling aggressive buybacks and dividend continuity .
- EPS miss was modest on a non-GAAP basis; GAAP loss was due to a non-cash goodwill impairment linked to lower market cap amid commodity price declines—no cash impact on FCF or liquidity .
- FY25 guidance improved materially: higher oil volumes, lower CapEx, lower cash taxes; FY25 Adj. FCF midpoint lifted to ~$850MM with ~$2.4B Adj. EBITDA, supporting continued capital returns .
- Near-term narrative risk: guided Q4 production trough from TIL cadence may pressure sentiment; management reiterated 2026 ramp and stronger per-share FCF outcomes over absolute volume growth .
- Four-mile lateral scalability is a structural tailwind to corporate breakevens and F&D costs; permitting and mechanical repeatability are key milestones—early results are encouraging .
- AI/ML adoption is broadening across operations and planning, with tangible efficiency gains at low incremental cost—potential medium-term margin upside .
- Watch midstream egress developments in Williston; improved options could tighten diffs and lower GPT, benefiting realizations and margins over time .
Appendix: Additional Data Tables
Q2 2025 vs Guidance (Actual vs May 6 guide)
Balance Sheet and Liquidity (Quarter-End)
Non-GAAP Reconciliations (Selected)
Disclosures
- S&P Global consensus and actuals used in “Estimates Context” are marked with an asterisk; Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Company financials and operational metrics are sourced from the Q2 2025 press release and 8-K, Q2 2025 call transcript, Q1 2025 press release, and Q4 2024 press release .